What evidence exists on the impacts of large herbivores on climate change? A systematic map protocol

Ramsay, Jennifer, Sandom, Christopher, Ings, Thomas and Wheeler, Helen C. (2022) What evidence exists on the impacts of large herbivores on climate change? A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 11 (1). p. 14. ISSN 2047-2382

[img]
Preview
Text
Published Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00270-2

Abstract

Background- In recent years there has been an increased focus on the role of large herbivores in ecosystem restoration and climate change mitigation. There are multiple processes by which large herbivores could potentially influence climate feedback and forcing effects, but the evidence has not yet been synthesised in a systematic and accessible format. Grazing, browsing, trampling, defecation, and seed dispersal by large herbivores can influence vegetation and soils in ways that may directly or indirectly contribute to climate change or mitigation. For example, changes in vegetation could impact wildfire regimes, carbon storage, and albedo, with ultimate impacts on climate. These processes may be influenced by herbivore species composition, density, and functional traits. The main aim of this systematic map is to synthesise the range of research on climate feedback and forcing effects from large herbivores (≥ 10 kg) in terrestrial ecosystems. We also aim to identify knowledge clusters and gaps in the research base, as well as assessing the potential for quantitative analyses. Methods- A search of peer-reviewed and grey literature will be conducted using a range of bibliographic databases, search engines and websites. The search strategy will involve using a pre-defined search string with Boolean operators. All search results will be screened for relevance according to specific eligibility criteria. Screening will be conducted in two stages: all articles will initially be screened by title and abstract, then those that meet the eligibility criteria will be screened by full text. At both stages, articles will be excluded if they don’t meet all eligibility criteria or if they meet any exclusion criteria. All articles included as eligible after full text screening will be coded. At each stage (of screening and coding) a proportion of articles will be processed independently by two reviewers to assess inter-reviewer reliability and resolve differences. The evidence will be presented in a searchable database with accompanying visual outputs. A narrative synthesis will be provided outlining the range and distribution of evidence, knowledge gaps and clusters, potential bias, and areas for further research.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Albedo, Browsing, Carbon, Climate feedbacks, Grazing, Herbivory, Restoration, Rewilding Wildfire
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Engineering
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 21 Apr 2022 09:17
Last Modified: 31 May 2022 16:18
URI: https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/707511

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item