Meads_et_al_2021.pdf (197.6 kB)
Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 15:36 authored by Catherine Meads, Laura-Rose Thorogood, Katy Lindemann, Susan BewleySame-sex female couples who wish to become pregnant can choose donor insemination or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)—a technique intended for infertile women. In general, women in same-sex female partnerships are no more likely to be infertile than those in opposite sex partnerships. This article investigates data available from the Government Regulator of UK fertility clinics—the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, which is the only data available worldwide on same-sex female couples and their fertility choices. IVF is increasing both in absolute numbers and relative proportions year on year in the UK, compared to licensed donor insemination for same-sex female couples. As IVF has greater human and financial costs than donor insemination, policies should not encourage it as the first choice for fertile women requiring sperm. Commercial transactions are taking place where fertile lesbians receive cut price, and arguably unnecessary, IVF intervention in exchange for selling their eggs to be used for other infertile customers. If women are not told about the efficacy of fresh vs. frozen semen, and the risks of egg ‘sharing’ or intra-couple donation, exploitation becomes possible.
History
Refereed
- Yes
Volume
9Issue number
12Page range
1657-1657Publication title
HealthcareISSN
2227-9032External DOI
Publisher
MDPIFile version
- Published version
Language
- eng
Official URL
Legacy posted date
2021-12-01Legacy creation date
2021-12-01Legacy Faculty/School/Department
Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social CareUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC