Horeck, Tanya and Negra, Diane (2021) Reconsidering television true crime and gendered authority in Allen v. Farrow. Feminist Media Studies. ISSN 1468-0777
|
Text
Accepted Version Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (248kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text (Word version)
Accepted Version Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (34kB) |
Abstract
This essay examines how the 2021 HBO docu-series Allen v. Farrow destabilizes a “he said/she said” framing of historic child sex abuse accusations against Hollywood auteur Woody Allen. Joining a number of other recent docu-series on celebrity sexual abuse cases, Allen v. Farrow repurposes the long-form true crime structure to focus sustained investigative attention on sexual violence as a crime that demands social justice. Refuting charges that the piece is “biased” against Allen, the essay argues that Kirby Dick’s and Amy Ziering’s four-part true crime investigative series is in fact designed to interrogate the notion of “communicative injustice”. In its support of Dylan and Mia Farrow’s voices, the docu-series challenges the cultural logics of “bothsidesism” and reveals how a misogynistic media culture enabled a gendered cultural narrative that silenced Dylan and painted her mother as a scorned and vengeful woman. As part of a wider cultural turn toward re-evaluating gender roles of the 1990s, Allen v.Farrow invites reflection on the gendered cultural logic that saw a child-exploiting midlife female vendetta as a more intelligible cultural script than male child sexual abuse.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | true crime, sexual abuse, celebrity, gender, #MeToo |
Faculty: | Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences |
Depositing User: | Lisa Blanshard |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2021 12:06 |
Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2023 02:02 |
URI: | https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/707073 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |