Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
1/1
2 files

Comparing invasive hemodynamic responses in adenosine hyperemia versus physical exercise stress in chronic coronary syndromes

Download all (2.2 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 19:12 authored by Christopher M. Cook, James P. Howard, Yousif Ahmad, Matthew J. Shun-Shin, Amarjit Sethi, Gerald J. Clesham, Kare H. Tang, Sukhjinder S. Nijjer, Paul A. Kelly, John R. Davies, Iqbal S. Malik, Raffi R. Kaprielian, Ghada W. Mikhail, Ricardo Petraco, Takayuki Warisawa, Firas Al-Janabi, Grigoris V. Karamasis, Shah R. Mohdnazri, Reto A. Gamma, Konstantinos E. Stathogiannis, Guus A. de Waard, Rasha Al-Lamee, Thomas R. Keeble, Jamil Mayet, Sayan Sen, Darrel P. Francis, Justin E. Davies
Objectives- Adenosine hyperemia is an integral component of the physiological assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). The aim of this study was to compare systemic, coronary and microcirculatory hemodynamics between intravenous (IV) adenosine hyperemia versus physical exercise stress in patients with CCS and coronary stenosis. Methods- Twenty-three patients (mean age, 60.6 ± 8.1 years) with CCS and single-vessel coronary stenosis underwent cardiac catheterization. Continuous trans-stenotic coronary pressure-flow measurements were performed during: i) IV adenosine hyperemia, and ii) physical exercise using a catheter-table-mounted supine ergometer. Systemic, coronary and microcirculatory hemodynamic responses were compared between IV adenosine and exercise stimuli. Results- Mean stenosis diameter was 74.6% ± 10.4. Median (interquartile range) FFR was 0.54 (0.44–0.72). At adenosine hyperemia versus exercise stress, mean aortic pressure (Pa, 91 ± 16 mmHg vs 99 ± 15 mmHg, p < 0.0001), distal coronary pressure (Pd, 58 ± 21 mmHg vs 69 ± 24 mmHg, p < 0.0001), trans-stenotic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa, 0.63 ± 0.18 vs 0.69 ± 0.19, p < 0.0001), microvascular resistance (MR, 2.9 ± 2.2 mmHg.cm−1.sec−1 vs 4.2 ± 1.7 mmHg.cm−1.sec−1, p = 0.001), heart rate (HR, 80 ± 15 bpm vs 85 ± 21 bpm, p = 0.02) and rate-pressure product (RPP, 7522 ± 2335 vs 9077 ± 3200, p = 0.0001) were all lower. Conversely, coronary flow velocity (APV, 23.7 ± 9.5 cm/s vs 18.5 ± 6.8 cm/s, p = 0.02) was higher. Additionally, temporal changes in Pa, Pd, Pd/Pa, MR, HR, RPP and APV during IV adenosine hyperemia versus exercise were all significantly different (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusions- In patients with CCS and coronary stenosis, invasive hemodynamic responses differed markedly between IV adenosine hyperemia versus physical exercise stress. These differences were observed across systemic, coronary and microcirculatory hemodynamics.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

342

Page range

7-14

Publication title

International Journal of Cardiology

ISSN

1874-1754

Publisher

Elsevier

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2021-10-26

Legacy creation date

2021-10-27

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC