Harvey, Annelie J. and Blackie, Laura (2022) Are predictions and perceptions of post-traumatic growth a form of ultimate justice reasoning? European Journal of Personality, 36 (4). pp. 443-465. ISSN 1099-0984
|
Text
Published Version Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution. Download (831kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text
Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution. Download (944kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Researchers have questioned whether self-report questionnaires adequately assess post-traumatic growth as it was theorized (positive personality change after trauma), versus assessing a broader coping mechanism. Across four studies, we examine whether individuals report post-traumatic growth as a coping mechanism to restore a sense of justice. In Studies 1 and 2, participants predicted greater post-traumatic growth for a hypothetical victim after a severe accident that caused grave suffering (and disrupted one’s belief in a just world), compared to an accident that caused minimal suffering (and did not disrupt one’s belief in a just world). Both perceptions of deservingness of post-traumatic growth for the victim (a belief in a just world mechanism) and engagement in deliberative rumination (a post-traumatic growth mechanism) mediated the effect of suffering on the prediction of post-traumatic growth in Study 2. The same pattern of results held when participants considered their own imagined suffering (Study 3), and when participants reported post-traumatic growth from distressing events in their own lives (Study 4). As such, we conclude that following an episode of suffering, either occurring to another or to oneself, self-reports of post-traumatic growth on questionnaires can reflect two distinct motivations: (1) an attempt to cope with perceived injustices and (2) the will to search for meaning in one’s suffering.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Post-traumatic Growth, Ultimate Justice Reasoning, Deservingness, Deliberative Rumination, Belief in a Just World |
Faculty: | Faculty of Science & Engineering |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic User |
Depositing User: | Symplectic User |
Date Deposited: | 03 Mar 2021 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jun 2022 12:53 |
URI: | https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/706384 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |