State Compensation as Rape Justice: Are Public Attitudes a Legitimate Foundation for Reform of the UK’s Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme?

Smith, Olivia and Daly, Ellen and Herriott, Charlotte and Willmott, Dominic (2021) State Compensation as Rape Justice: Are Public Attitudes a Legitimate Foundation for Reform of the UK’s Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme? Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 59 (6). pp. 1562-1581. ISSN 2398-6816

Preview

Text Accepted Version Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The British state’s mechanism for compensating victim-survivors of sexual offences has been critiqued as retraumatising. However, a recent review preliminarily rejected calls to loosen the eligibility rules, stating that the current criteria reflect public attitudes. This article outlines the first empirical study of public opinion on the UK Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS), drawing on data from over 2,000 survey participants. The findings show ambivalence among members of the public, but also reveal the current rules are not strongly supported and are in some cases highly unpopular. The article then examines some difficulties with relying on public opinion for criminal justice reform, and ultimately argues that there are stronger justifications for reforming the CICS than popularity with the public. Specifically, loosening the eligibility criteria would create more legitimate policy through the protection of core societal values such as fairness and dignity.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Keywords:	compensation, justice and reparation, public opinion, rape and sexual violence
Faculty:	Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
Depositing User:	Lisa Blanshard
Date Deposited:	08 Oct 2020 09:52
Last Modified:	22 Jan 2022 02:02
URI:	https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/705967

Actions (login required)

Edit Item