Consumption of fish and omega-3 fatty acids and cancer risk: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies

Lee, Keum Hwa and Seong, Hyo Jin and Kim, Gaeun and Jeong, Gwang Hun and Kim, Jong Yeob and Park, Hyunbong and Jung, Eunyoung and Kronbichler, Andreas and Eisenhut, Michael and Stubbs, Brendon and Solmi, Marco and Koyanagi, Ai and Hong, Sung Hwi and Dragioti, Elena and de Rezende, Leandro F. M. and Jacob, Louis and Keum, NaNa and van der Vliet, Hans J. and Cho, Eunyoung and Veronese, Nicola and Grosso, Giuseppe and Ogino, Shuji and Song, Mingyang and Radua, Joaquim and Jung, Sun Jae and Thompson, Trevor and Jackson, Sarah E. and Smith, Lee and Yang, Lin and Oh, Hans and Choi, Eun Kyoung and Shin, Jae Il and Giovannucci, Edward L. and Gamerith, Gabriele (2020) Consumption of fish and omega-3 fatty acids and cancer risk: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. Advances in Nutrition. ISSN 2156-5376

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 June 2021.
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (231kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmaa055

Abstract

Multiple studies have suggested that ω-3 fatty acid intake may have a protective effect on cancer risk; however, its true association with cancer risk remains controversial. We performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses to summarize and evaluate the evidence for the association between ω-3 fatty acid intake and cancer outcomes. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to December 1, 2018. We included meta-analyses of observational studies that examined associations between intake of fish or ω-3 fatty acid and cancer risk (gastrointestinal, liver, breast, gynecologic, prostate, brain, lung, and skin) and determined the level of evidence of associations. In addition, we appraised the quality of the evidence of significant meta-analyses by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. We initially screened 598 articles, and 15 articles, including 57 meta-analyses, were eligible. Among 57 meta-analyses, 15 reported statistically significant results. We found that 12 meta-analyses showed weak evidence of an association between ω-3 fatty acid intake and risk of the following types of cancer: liver cancer (n = 4 of 6), breast cancer (n = 3 of 14), prostate cancer (n = 3 of 11), and brain tumor (n = 2 of 2). In the other 3 meta-analyses, studies of endometrial cancer and skin cancer, there were no assessable data for determining the evidence levels. No meta-analysis showed convincing, highly suggestive, or suggestive evidence of an association. In the sensitivity analysis of meta-analyses by study design, we found weak associations between ω-3 fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk in cohort studies, but no statistically significant association in case-control studies. However, the opposite results were found in case of brain tumor risk. Although ω-3 fatty acids have been studied in several meta-analyses with regard to a wide range of cancer outcomes, only weak associations were identified in some cancer types, with several limitations. Considering the nonsignificant or weak evidence level, clinicians and researchers should cautiously interpret reported associations between ω-3 fatty acid consumption and cancer risks.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Omega-3 fatty acid, fish, cancer, umbrella review, meta-analysis
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Engineering
Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2020 08:42
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2020 10:55
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/705429

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item