Factors associated with loneliness: an umbrella review of observational studies

Solmi, Marco and Veronese, Nicola and Galvano, Daiana and Favaro, Angela and Ostinelli, Edoardo G. and Noventa, Vania and Favaretto, Elisa and Tudor, Florina and Finessi, Matilde and Shin, Jae Il and Smith, Lee and Koyanagi, Ai and Cester, Alberto and Bolzetta, Francesco and Cotroneo, Antonino and Maggi, Stefania and Demurtas, Jacopo and de Leo, Diego and Trabucchi, Marco (2020) Factors associated with loneliness: an umbrella review of observational studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 271. pp. 131-138. ISSN 1573-2517

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 April 2021.
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (120kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.075

Abstract

Background: Evidence provides inconsistent findings on risk factors and health outcomes associated with loneliness. The aim of this work was to grade the evidence on risk factors and health outcomes associated with loneliness, using an umbrella review approach. Methods: For each meta-analytic association, random-effects summary effect size, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity, evidence for small-study effect, excess significance bias and 95% prediction intervals were calculated, and used to grade significant evidence (p<0.05) from convincing to weak. For narrative systematic reviews, findings were reported descriptively. Results: From 210 studies initially evaluated, 14 publications were included, reporting on 18 outcomes, 795 studies, and 746,706 participants. Highly suggestive evidence (class II) supported the association between loneliness and incident dementia (relative risk, RR=1.26; 95%CI: 1.14-1.40, I2 23.6%), prevalent paranoia (odds ratio, OR=3.36; 95%CI: 2.51-4.49, I2 92.8%) and prevalent psychotic symptoms (OR=2.33; 95%CI: 1.68-3.22, I2 56.5%). Pooled data supported the longitudinal association between loneliness and suicide attempts and depressive symptoms. In narrative systematic reviews, factors cross-sectionally associated with loneliness were age (in a U-shape way), female sex, quality of social contacts, low competence, socio-economic status and medical chronic conditions. Limitations: low quality of the studies included; mainly cross-sectional evidence. Conclusions: This work is the first meta-evidence synthesis showing that highly suggestive and significant evidence supports the association between loneliness and adverse mental and physical health outcomes. More cohort studies are needed to disentangle the direction of the association between risk factors for loneliness and its related health outcomes.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: loneliness, meta-analysis, risk factor, health outcome, umbrella review
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Engineering
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2020 11:57
Last Modified: 03 Sep 2020 14:10
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/705351

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item