Ivory, Chris and Shipton, Helen (2020) Latour and Woolgar’s ‘cycle of scientific credibility’ as a basis for conceptualizing business school strategy. Review of Managerial Science, 14. pp. 379-391. ISSN 1863-6691
|
Text
Accepted Version Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (275kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Drawing on contemporary and historical discourse around UK business schools and insights from the sociology of scientific knowledge, we argue that business schools should be understood and judged, not as they typically have been, as engines of knowledge production, but as engines of credibility production. Credibility, we argue, is central to the attractiveness of business schools to students and other key stakeholders and therefore credibility, and the mechanisms through which credibility are maintained, should be at the center of strategic thinking within business schools. We argue that over-reliance on funding from corporate sources can have profound consequences for the ability of schools to continue to produce credibility. This article focuses primarily on the experiences of business schools in the UK.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Third-party funding, Reputation, Credibility, Knowledge production, Business schools |
| Faculty: | Faculty of Business & Law |
| SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic User |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic User |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2019 10:30 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Sep 2021 18:53 |
| URI: | https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/704367 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |