Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
McKearney_MANUSCRIPT_2018.docx (171.65 kB)

Tinnitus information online – does it ring true?

Download (171.65 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 16:01 authored by Richard M. McKearney, Robert C. Mackinnon, Mark Smith, Richard J. Baker
Objective: To assess, using standardised tools, the quality and readability of online tinnitus information that patients are likely to access. Methods: A standardised review was conducted of websites relating to tinnitus and its management. Each website was scored using the DISCERN instrument and the Flesch Reading Ease scale. Results: Twenty-seven unique websites were evaluated. The mean DISCERN score of the websites was 34.5 out of 80 (standard deviation = 11.2). This would be considered 'fair' in quality. Variability in DISCERN score between websites was high (range, 15-57: 'poor' to 'very good'). Website readability was poor, with a mean Flesch Reading Ease score of 52.6 (standard deviation = 7.7); this would be considered 'difficult' to read. Conclusion: In general, the quality of tinnitus websites is fair and the readability is poor, with substantial variability in quality between websites. The Action on Hearing Loss and the British Tinnitus Association websites were identified as providing the highest quality information.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

132

Issue number

11

Page range

984-989

Publication title

Journal of Laryngology & Otology

ISSN

1748-5460

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2019-02-08

Legacy creation date

2019-02-08

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Science & Engineering

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC