Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Diker-Vanberg_2018.docx (85.94 kB)

Data protection in the UK post Brexit: The only certainty is uncertainty

Download (85.94 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 15:06 authored by Aysem Diker Vanberg, Maelya Maunick
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on May 4 2016 . The GDPR replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC). After a two-year transition period, the GDPR will be binding on all member states including the UK, from 25 May 2018. Subsequent to the referendum result on June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union, the UK invoked Article 50.2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and notified the EU of intention to withdraw from the EU membership on 29 March 2017. Pursuant to Article 50.3 TEU, following this notification the UK has two years to negotiate a new trading relationship with the EU Set against this background, this paper will critically examine the implications of Britain’s exit from the EU (hereinafter Brexit) on data protection law in the UK with a particular focus on the various trade models available to the UK post Brexit. There are various trade models available to the UK in terms of exiting the EU, such as the EEA model, the Swiss model, the free trade agreement as adopted by Canada, as well as the WTO model. Regardless of the agreed trading model, the GDPR will continue to be relevant for many organisations and businesses in the UK, as long as they wish to operate within the EU and transfer data across borders. This article contends that irrespective of the model chosen for exiting the European Union, the UK will adopt standards almost identical to the GDPR in order to remain a competitive actor in the global economy. Nevertheless, even if the UK endeavours to adopt the same as or equivalent standards to the GDPR as a third country, this does not necessarily secure an adequacy decision from the EU commission, potentially leading to burdensome requirements for UK businesses and their trading partners.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

32

Issue number

1

Page range

190-206

Publication title

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

ISSN

1364-6885

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2018-01-29

Legacy creation date

2018-01-27

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Arts, Law & Social Sciences (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC