More superimposition for contrast-modulated than luminance-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry

Skerswetat, Jan, Formankiewicz, Monika A. and Waugh, Sarah J. (2018) More superimposition for contrast-modulated than luminance-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 142. pp. 40-51. ISSN 1878-5646

Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL:


Luminance-modulated noise (LM) and contrast-modulated noise (CM) gratings were presented with interocularly correlated, uncorrelated and anti-correlated binary noise to investigate their contributions to mixed percepts, specifically piecemeal and superimposition, during binocular rivalry. Stimuli were sine-wave gratings of 2c/deg presented within 2 deg circular apertures. The LM stimulus contrast was 0.1 and the CM stimulus modulation depth was 1.0, equating to approximately 5 and 7 times detection threshold, respectively. Twelve 45s trials, per noise configuration, were carried out. Fifteen participants with normal vision indicated via button presses whether an exclusive, piecemeal or superimposed percept was seen. For all noise conditions LM stimuli generated more exclusive visibility, and lower proportions of superimposition. CM stimuli led to greater proportions and longer periods of superimposition. For both stimulus types, correlated interocular noise generated more superimposition than did anti- or uncorrelated interocular noise. No significant effect of stimulus type (LM vs CM) or noise configuration (correlated, uncorrelated, anti-correlated) on piecemeal perception was found. Exclusive visibility was greater in proportion, and perceptual changes more numerous, during binocular rivalry for CM stimuli when interocular noise was not correlated. This suggests that mutual inhibition, initiated by non-correlated noise CM gratings, occurs between neurons processing luminance noise (first-order component), as well as those processing gratings (second-order component). Therefore, first- and second-order components can contribute to overall binocular rivalry responses. We suggest the addition of a new well to the current energy landscape model for binocular rivalry that takes superimposition into account.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Binocular rivalry, Piecemeal percepts, Superimposition, Interocular noise, Second-order, First-order
Faculty: ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)
Depositing User: Dr Jan Skerswetat
Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2017 12:29
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2021 18:57

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item