Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Monger_et_al_2016.docx (37.07 kB)

The effect of viewing distance on responses to the pattern glare test

Download (37.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 14:14 authored by Laura J. Monger, Dhruvi Shah, Arnold J. Wilkins, Peter M. Allen
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether symptoms of pattern glare were affected by viewing distance, as distinct from spatial frequency, because of an association between symptoms and anomalies of accommodation and vergence. METHODS: One hundred young adults viewed gratings with spatial frequencies of 0.3, 2.3 and 9.4 cycles per degree (cpd) at four test distances (0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 metres). Participants were asked to grade the presence of 15 symptoms of visual perceptual distortions and discomfort, on a scale from zero (no symptoms) to 10 (maximum perceptual and somatic symptoms). RESULTS: The viewing distance did not affect the nature and strength of symptoms, when viewing gratings with similar spatial frequencies. The symptoms increased with spatial frequency (p < 0.008 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms from the Pattern Glare Test do not appear to be modulated by the changes in accommodation and vergence associated with viewing distance, at least in an unselected sample of students. The highest spatial frequency of the current Pattern Glare Test was 9.4 cpd at 0.4 metre and this is insufficiently high to measure the reduction in symptoms at high spatial frequencies. If assessing relative aversion to gratings of different spatial frequencies, it may be useful to increase the testing distance to 0.6 metre so as to increase the spatial frequency of the third grating to 14.2 cpd.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

99

Issue number

1

Page range

47-50

Publication title

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

ISSN

1444-0938

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2016-03-03

Legacy creation date

2016-08-22

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC