Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Burden versus benefit: continuing nurse academics' experiences of working with sessional teachers

journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 12:59 authored by Kathleen Peters, Debra Jackson, Sharon Andrew, Elizabeth J. Halcomb, Yenna Salamonson
Sessional teachers are taking an increasing role in classroom teaching in Schools of Nursing. However, there is a paucity of literature reporting the experiences of, and impact on, career academics working with or alongside the burgeoning numbers of sessional teachers. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of continuing academics working with sessional teachers. This qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit nurse academics and collect narrative data related to their experiences of working with sessional teachers. Four major themes emerged from the data, namely: They have got real credibility - perceptions of clinical currency, We've got people who are very good clinically, but don't know how to teach - lacking skills and confidence, No allegiance to the school or the students - perceived lack of commitment and accountability, and A terrible burden - workload implications for continuing academics. The development and implementation of standards for the recruitment and employment of sessional teachers would benefit both continuing academics and sessional teachers, and assist in the delivery of quality teaching and learning to nursing students.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

38

Issue number

1-2

Page range

35-44

Publication title

Contemporary Nurse

ISSN

1839-3535

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Language

  • other

Legacy posted date

2013-04-29

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC