On probation: pickled and nothing to say

Mantle, Greg and Moore, Stephen (2004) On probation: pickled and nothing to say. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 (3). pp. 299-316. ISSN 1468-2311

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00329.x

Abstract

The probation service is at risk of serious harm from the discourses of toughness and cure. People subject to community rehabilitation orders are categorised first and foremost as ‘offenders’ by probation officers, their managers and governors. Not surprisingly, people on probation are increasingly viewed as bad or as misfits, either way they have nothing intrinsically valuable to contribute to their supervision nor to the work of the probation service more generally. As a counter to this exclusion and disenfranchisement, two replacement discourses are commended: first, the language of userism/consumerism; and, second, an integration of strain and rational choice crime theories, as an alternative to the ‘psychic prisons’ of conservatism and individual positivism fast enveloping the service.

Item Type: Journal Article
Faculty: ARCHIVED Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education (until September 2018)
Depositing User: Repository Admin
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2010 11:37
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2021 16:18
URI: https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/116727

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item