Referral of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers for primary healthcare practitioners

Watson, Jane S. and Adab, Peymane and Jordan, Rachel E. and Enocson, Alexandra and Greenfield, Sheila (2020) Referral of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers for primary healthcare practitioners. British Journal of General Practice, 70 (693). e274-e284. ISSN 1478-5242

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 January 2021.
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)
[img] Other (Policy)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (39kB)
[img] Other (Correspondence)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (90kB)
Official URL: http://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20x708101

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cost-effective, internationally recommended intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Referral is predominately led by primary healthcare practitioners (PHCPs), but referral and patient uptake is poor. Aim: To understand barriers and enablers for PHCPs when considering patient referral to PR, to explore the influence of patient characteristics, and to understand how referral rates may be increased. Design and setting: PHCPs who care for and refer patients with COPD to PR were purposively selected from general practices across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, and the West Midlands. Method: A qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken to theme saturation, exploring PR referral. Images depicting patients with varying COPD severity were used to stimulate memory and associative recall. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: A total of 19 PHCPs were interviewed. Barriers to PR referral included limited awareness of the clinical benefits, little knowledge of local PR providers, consultation time constraints, and presumed low patient motivation. While practice nurses had the greatest knowledge, they still described difficulty in promoting PR. PHCPs frequently described assessing patient suitability based on presumed accessibility, social, and disease-specific characteristics rather than the clinical benefits of PR. Referrals were facilitated by financial incentives for the practice and positive feedback from patients and providers. Conclusion: There were more barriers to PR referral than enablers. Providers must engage better with PHCPs, patients with COPD, and carers, and actively promote PR. Increasing PHCPs’ awareness of the benefits of PR, financial incentives, and alternative referral pathways should be considered.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: COPD, pulmonary disease, chronic, obstructive, pulmonary rehabilitation, referral
Faculty: Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 04 May 2020 10:06
Last Modified: 26 Jun 2020 10:43
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/705478

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item