A mixed‐methods evaluation of a Recovery College in South East Essex for people with mental health difficulties

Wilson, Ceri and King, Matthew and Russell, Jessica (2019) A mixed‐methods evaluation of a Recovery College in South East Essex for people with mental health difficulties. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27 (5). pp. 1353-1362. ISSN 1365-2524

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 June 2020.
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (67kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12774

Abstract

Recovery Colleges aim to assist people with mental health difficulties in the journey to recovery through education. They bring together professional and lived experience of mental health challenges in a non-stigmatising college environment and operate on college principles. All courses are designed to contribute towards wellbeing and recovery. Despite the ever-growing number of Recovery Colleges (both in the UK and internationally), the evaluative evidence is limited; comprising mostly non-peer-reviewed evaluations, audits and case studies. The present article comprises a mixed-methods evaluation of a newly established Recovery College in South East Essex, UK. The evaluation comprised questionnaires of mental wellbeing and social inclusion at baseline, and three and six month follow-up; in addition to three focus groups. There were significant improvements in both mental wellbeing and social inclusion from baseline to six month follow-up (25 participants completed the measure of wellbeing at both time points, and 19 completed the measure of social inclusion). This was supported by additional free-text questionnaire comments and focus group findings (17 participants participated across the focus groups), with reports of increased confidence, reduced anxiety, and increased social inclusion/reduced social isolation. Additionally, at six month follow-up the majority of respondents were planning on attending courses external to the Recovery College, volunteering, and/or gaining paid employment. Challenges and recommendations identified through the focus groups indicate the importance for standardisation of processes (which is particularly important when multiple organisations are involved in the running of a Recovery College), as well as consideration of longer-running courses. Funders should continue to invest in the Recovery College movement as the growing evidence-base is demonstrating how these colleges can help address the high prevalence of mental health difficulties, by promoting mental wellbeing and social inclusion.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Mental health, Mental wellbeing, Mixed methods, Recovery, Recovery College, Social inclusion
Faculty: Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 07 Jun 2019 09:55
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2019 16:07
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/704389

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item