Clinicians’ role in the adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and its implications for organizational practices: A Qualitative Case Study

Jacob, Christine and Sanchez-Vazquez, Antonio and Ivory, Chris (2019) Clinicians’ role in the adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and its implications for organizational practices: A Qualitative Case Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7 (5). e13555. ISSN 2291-5222

[img]
Preview
Text
Published Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (932kB) | Preview
[img] Text
Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (957kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13555

Abstract

Background: Despite the existence of adequate technological infrastructure and clearer policies, there are situations where users, mainly physicians, resist mobile health (mHealth) solutions. This is of particular concern, bearing in mind that several studies, both in developed and developing countries, showed that clinicians’ adoption is the most influential factor in such solutions’ success. Objective: This research focuses on understanding clinicians’ roles in the adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App, the factors impacting this adoption, and its implications for organizational and social practices. Methods: A qualitative case study of a decision support app in Oncology, called ONCOassist. The data were collected through 17 in-depth interviews with clinicians and nurses in the UK, Ireland, France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. Results: This case demonstrates the affordances and constraints of mHealth technology at the workplace, their implications for the organization of work, and clinicians’ role in their constant development and adoption. The research findings confirmed that factors such as app operation and stability, ease of use, usefulness, cost, and portability play a major role in the adoption process; however, other social factors such as endorsement, neutrality of the content, attitude towards technology, existing workload and internal organizational politics are also perceived as key determinants of clinicians’ adoption. Interoperability and cultural views of mobile usage at work are the key workflow disadvantages; while higher efficiency and performance, sharpened practice and location flexibility are the main workflow advantages. Conclusions: Several organizational implications emerged, suggesting the need for some actions such as fostering a work culture that embraces new technologies, and the creation of new digital roles for clinicians both on the hospitals/clinics and on the development sides but also more collaboration between healthcare organizations and Digital Health providers to enable Electronic Medical Record (EMR) integration and solve any interoperability issues. From a theoretical perspective, we also suggest the addition of a fourth step to Leonardi’s (2018) methodological guidance to account for user engagement; embedding the users in the continuous design and development processes ensures the understanding of user-specific affordances that can then be made more obvious to other users and increase the potential of such tools to go beyond their technological features and have a higher impact on workflow and the organizing process.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: telemedicine, smartphone, cell phone, oncologists, electronic health record, workflow, workload, workplace, public health practice, technology, perception, health education, mHealth, mobile health, telehealth, eHealth
Faculty: Faculty of Business & Law
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic User
Depositing User: Symplectic User
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2019 09:16
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2019 16:08
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/704248

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item