Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study

Virgili, Gianni and Michelessi, Manuele and Cook, Jonathan and Boachie, Charles and Burr, Jennifer M. and Banister, Katie and Garway-Heath, David F. and Bourne, Rupert R. A. and Asorey Garcia, Almudena and Ramsay, Craig R. and Azuara-Blanco, Augusto (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 102 (5). pp. 604-610. ISSN 1468-2079

[img]
Preview
Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (112kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Supplementary information - figures)
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (527kB) | Preview
[img] Other (Acceptance)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (188kB)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310642

Abstract

Background/Aims: To assess the diagnostic performance of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) data of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting glaucoma. Methods: Secondary analyses of a prospective, multicentre diagnostic study (Glaucoma Automated Tests Evaluation (GATE)) referred to hospital eye services in the UK were conducted. We included data from 899 of 966 participants referred to hospital eye services with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension. We used both eyes’ data and logistic regression-based receiver operator characteristics analysis to build a set of models to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the average and inferior quadrant RNFL thickness data of OCT. The reference standard was expert clinician examination including automated perimetry. The main outcome measures were sensitivity at 0.95 specificity and specificity at 0.95 sensitivity and the corresponding RNFL thickness thresholds. We explored the possibility of accuracy improvement by adding measures of within-eye and between-eye variation, scan quality, intraocular pressure (IOP) and age. Results: Glaucoma was diagnosed in at least one eye in 17% of participants. Areas under the curve were between 0.83 and 0.88. When specificity was fixed at 0.95, the sensitivity was between 0.38 and 0.55, and the highest values were reached with models including the inferior quadrant rather than the average RNFL thickness. Fixing specificity at 0.95, the sensitivity was between 0.36 and 0.58. The addition of age, refractive error, IOP or within-subject variation did not improve the accuracy. Conclusion: RNFL thickness data of OCT can be used as a diagnostic test, but accuracy estimates remain moderate even in exploratory multivariable modelling of aiming to improve accuracy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: diagnostic tests/investigation, glaucoma, imaging
Faculty: Faculty of Medical Science
Depositing User: Ian Walker
Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2017 11:30
Last Modified: 01 May 2018 10:46
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/702237

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item