e-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECT score to computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients

Nagel, Simon and Sinha, Devesh and Day, Diana and Reith, Wolfgang and Chapot, René and Papanagiotou, Panagiotis and Warburton, Elizabeth A. and Guyler, Paul and Tysoe, Sharon and Fassbender, Klaus and Walter, Silke and Essig, Marco and Heidenrich, Jens and Konstas, Angelos A. and Harrison, Michael and Papadakis, Michalis and Greveson, Eric and Joly, Olivier and Gerry, Stephen and Maguire, Holly and Roffe, Christine and Hampton-Till, James and Buchan, Alastair M. and Grunwald, Iris Q. (2016) e-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECT score to computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. International Journal of Stroke, 12 (6). pp. 615-622. ISSN 1747-4949

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (44kB)
[img] Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (68kB)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747493016681020

Abstract

Background: The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is an established 10-point quantitative topographic computed tomography scan score to assess early ischemic changes. We performed a non-inferiority trial between the e-ASPECTS software and neuroradiologists in scoring ASPECTS on non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images of acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods : In this multicenter study, e-ASPECTS and three independent neuroradiologists retrospectively and blindly assessed baseline non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images of 132 patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Follow-up scans served as ground truth to determine the definite area of infarction. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for region- and score-based analysis, receiver-operating characteristic curves, Bland-Altman plots and Matthews correlation coefficients relative to the ground truth were calculated and comparisons were made between neuroradiologists and different pre-specified e-ASPECTS operating points. The non-inferiority margin was set to 10% for both sensitivity and specificity on region-based analysis. Results : In total 2640 (132 patients × 20 regions per patient) ASPECTS regions were scored. Mean time from onset to baseline computed tomography was 146 ± 124 min and median NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 11 (6–17, interquartile range). Median ASPECTS for ground truth on follow-up imaging was 8 (6.5–9, interquartile range). In the region-based analysis, two e-ASPECTS operating points (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 44%, 93%, 87% and 44%, 91%, 85%) were statistically non-inferior to all three neuroradiologists (all p-values <0.003). Both Matthews correlation coefficients for e-ASPECTS were higher (0.36 and 0.34) than those of all neuroradiologists (0.32, 0.31, and 0.3). Conclusions : e-ASPECTS was non-inferior to three neuroradiologists in scoring ASPECTS on non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images of acute stroke patients.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, computed tomography, ischemic stroke, machine learning
Faculty: ARCHIVED Faculty of Medical Science (until September 2018)
Depositing User: Ian Walker
Date Deposited: 02 Feb 2017 16:47
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2019 16:11
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/701469

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item