Synergies between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision: Lessons on integrated ecosystem service valuation from a Himalayan protected area, Nepal

Peh, Kelvin S. -H. and Thapa, Ishana and Basnyat, Menuka and Balmford, Andrew and Bhattarai, Gopal P. and Bradbury, Richard B. and Brown, Claire and Butchart, Stuart H. M. and Dhakal, Maheshwar and Gurung, Hum and Hughes, Francine M. R. and Mulligan, Mark and Pandeya, Bhopal and Stattersfield, Alison and Thomas, David H. L. and Walpole, Matt and Merriman, Jennifer C. (2016) Synergies between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision: Lessons on integrated ecosystem service valuation from a Himalayan protected area, Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 22 (B). pp. 359-369. ISSN 2212-0416

[img]
Preview
Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Other (Acceptance)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (165kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.05.003

Abstract

We utilised a practical approach to integrated ecosystem service valuation to inform decision-making at Shivapuri-Nagarjun National Park in Nepal. The Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) was used to compare ecosystem services between two alternative states of the site (protection or lack of protection with consequent changed land use) to estimate the net consequences of protection. We estimated that lack of protection would have substantially reduced the annual ecosystem service flow, including a 74% reduction in the value of greenhouse gas sequestration, 60% reduction in carbon storage, 94% reduction in nature-based recreation, and 88% reduction in water quality. The net monetary benefit of the park was estimated at $11 million year-1. We conclude that: (1) simplified cost-benefit analysis between alternative states can be usefully employed to determine the ecosystem service consequences of land-use change, but monetary benefits should be subject to additional sensitivity analysis; (2) both biophysical indicators and monetary values can be standardised using rose plots, to illustrate the magnitude of synergies and trade-offs among the services; and (3) continued biodiversity protection measures can preserve carbon stock, although the benefit of doing so remains virtual unless an effective governance option is established to realise the monetary values.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Alternative state, decision-making, integrated valuation, rapid assessment, trade-off, TESSA
Faculty: ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)
Depositing User: Dr. Francine M.R. Hughes
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2016 15:06
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2019 14:22
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/700045

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item