Climate stories: Why do climate scientists and sceptical voices participate in the climate debate?

Sharman, Amelia and Howarth, Candice C. (2017) Climate stories: Why do climate scientists and sceptical voices participate in the climate debate? Public Understanding of Science, 26 (7). pp. 826-842. ISSN 1361-6609

[img]
Preview
Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (247kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662516632453

Abstract

Public perceptions of the climate debate predominantly frame the key actors as climate scientists versus sceptical voices; however, it is unclear why climate scientists and sceptical voices choose to participate in this antagonistic and polarised public battle. A narrative interview approach is used to better understand the underlying rationales behind 22 climate scientists’ and sceptical voices’ engagement in the climate debate, potential commonalities, as well as each actor’s ability to be critically self-reflexive. Several overlapping rationales are identified including a sense of duty to publicly engage, agreement that complete certainty about the complex assemblage of climate change is unattainable and that political factors are central to the climate debate. We argue that a focus on potential overlaps in perceptions and rationales as well as the ability to be critically self-reflexive may encourage constructive discussion among actors previously engaged in purposefully antagonistic exchange on climate change.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: climate change, climate scientists, debate participation, perceptions, sceptical voices
Faculty: ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)
Depositing User: Repository Admin
Date Deposited: 17 Mar 2016 08:47
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2018 15:01
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/601463

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item