Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
1/1
2 files

What Are the Structural Barriers to Planning for Later Life? A Scoping Review of the Literature

journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 16:13 authored by Claire Preston, Nick Drydakis, Suzanne Hughes, Suzanna E. Forwood, Catherine Meads
The rollback of the welfare state in countries such as the UK, coupled with population ageing, have contributed to a situation in which responsibility for older people’s wellbeing is placed more heavily on the individual. This is exemplified in the notion in popular and policy circles that individuals should plan for later life, particularly financially, and a corresponding concern that they are not doing so sufficiently. This scoping review aimed to identify the structural factors which inhibit people from engaging in planning for later life. For the purposes of this review, we characterised planning as the range of activities people deliberately pursue with the aim of achieving desired outcomes in later life. This entails a future, as opposed to shorter-term goal orientation. In study selection, we focused on planning at mid-life (age 40-60). Systematic and snowball searching identified 2,317 studies, of which 36 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The review found that limited financial resources were a key barrier to planning. Related factors included: living in rented accommodation, informal caring, and working part-time. A lack of support from employers, industry, regulators and landlords was also found to inhibit planning. The findings suggest that certain sections of society are effectively excluded from planning. This is particularly problematic if popular and policy discourse comes to blame individuals for failing to plan. The review also provides a critical perspective on planning, highlighting a tendency in the literature towards individualistic and productivist interpretations of the concept.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

7

Issue number

3

Page range

17-26

Publication title

Social Inclusion

ISSN

2183-2803

Publisher

Cogitatio Press

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2019-04-16

Legacy creation date

2019-04-16

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC