McKearney_MANUSCRIPT_2018.docx (171.65 kB)
Tinnitus information online – does it ring true?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 16:01 authored by Richard M. McKearney, Robert C. Mackinnon, Mark Smith, Richard J. BakerObjective:
To assess, using standardised tools, the quality and readability of online tinnitus information that patients are likely to access.
Methods:
A standardised review was conducted of websites relating to tinnitus and its management. Each website was scored using the DISCERN instrument and the Flesch Reading Ease scale.
Results:
Twenty-seven unique websites were evaluated. The mean DISCERN score of the websites was 34.5 out of 80 (standard deviation = 11.2). This would be considered 'fair' in quality. Variability in DISCERN score between websites was high (range, 15-57: 'poor' to 'very good'). Website readability was poor, with a mean Flesch Reading Ease score of 52.6 (standard deviation = 7.7); this would be considered 'difficult' to read.
Conclusion:
In general, the quality of tinnitus websites is fair and the readability is poor, with substantial variability in quality between websites. The Action on Hearing Loss and the British Tinnitus Association websites were identified as providing the highest quality information.
History
Refereed
- Yes
Volume
132Issue number
11Page range
984-989Publication title
Journal of Laryngology & OtologyISSN
1748-5460External DOI
Publisher
Cambridge University PressFile version
- Accepted version
Language
- eng
Official URL
Legacy posted date
2019-02-08Legacy creation date
2019-02-08Legacy Faculty/School/Department
Faculty of Science & EngineeringUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC