Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Noble_2014.doc (114 kB)

Your Privacy in Their Hands: Exclusion of the Public from Local Authority Regulatory Committee Meetings

Download (114 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 15:25 authored by Andrew Noble
Local authorities in England and Wales perform their various functions under a general ethos of openness and transparency. However, there are certain situations where information available to local authorities ought not to be disclosed to the general public. One such situation is where local authorities are required to determine applications for the grant of licences to engage in specific occupations. This role also carries with it the power to discipline licence holders, including removal of the licence, for breaches of the general law or any conditions attached to such a licence. The authority to grant licences and discipline licence holders is normally delegated to a regulatory committee of the council. Proceedings before regulatory committees routinely take the form of quasi-judicial hearings. Because of the nature of the proceedings, committee hearings are likely to involve dealing with information of a highly personal character, which is potentially sensitive, embarrassing or damaging for the individual applicant or licence-holder. Local authorities have a statutory discretion to exclude the public from committee meetings where it is likely that ‘exempt information’ would be disclosed. The records of regulatory committee meetings reveal that liberal use is made of this discretion at hearings concerning the grant or removal of licences. The decision to exclude the public is often based on the council’s own notions of what constitutes ‘exempt information’ and when the public interest in non-disclosure outweighs that in disclosure. Because of the way in which the discretion to exclude is exercised, it largely fails to deliver either privacy for the individual or transparent decision-making for the authority. In this paper, the use and value of the local authority’s discretion is assessed, together with some suggestions for a more consistent approach to address the current tension between privacy and openness.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

13

Issue number

2

Page range

93-112

Publication title

Contemporary Issues in Law

ISSN

1357-0374

Publisher

Lawtext Publishing

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2018-06-27

Legacy creation date

2018-06-26

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Lord Ashcroft International Business School (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC