Sheehan_2018_2.pdf (5.55 MB)
Case/agreement matching: evidence for a cognitive bias
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 14:20 authored by Michelle Sheehan, Albertyna Paciorek, John WilliamsIn an artificial language experiment, participants were taught two different artificial languages consisting of English content words and novel morphological marking. The first of the languages had matching alignment in both case and agreement, as attested in natural languages such as Basque, Belhare and Tsez. The other language combined accusative case alignment with ergative agreement alignment, a combination which is apparently unattested amongst natural languages. There was no significant difference between the languages in terms of the proportion of participants that showed awareness of the agreement pattern, nor in the ability of aware participants to recall case markers and inflections during training, or select the correct verb inflection in the generation post-test. However, amongst participants who remained unaware of the agreement pattern there was a significant difference in recall of verb inflections and case markers during the exposure phase task – recall was more accurate in the (attested) language with matching case and agreement alignment than the (nonattested) language in which case and agreement alignment were unmatched. We take this as evidence that there is a cognitive bias against the unattested non-matching alignment, reflected in implicit learning.
History
Refereed
- Yes
Volume
3Issue number
1Page range
92Publication title
Glossa: A Journal of General LinguisticsISSN
2397-1835External DOI
Publisher
Ubiquity PressFile version
- Published version
Language
- eng
Official URL
Legacy posted date
2018-05-17Legacy creation date
2018-05-15Legacy Faculty/School/Department
ARCHIVED Faculty of Arts, Law & Social Sciences (until September 2018)Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC