Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Swami_2017_3.docx (119.53 kB)

The Relationship Between Schizotypal Facets and Conspiracist Beliefs via Cognitive Processes

Download (119.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 14:55 authored by David Barron, Adrian Furnham, Laura Weis, Kevin D. Morgan, Tony Towell, Viren Swami
This study sought to replicate previous work showing relationships between components of schizotypy and conspiracist beliefs, and extend it by examining the mediating role of cognitive processes. An international online sample of 411 women and men (mean age = 35.41 years) completed measures of the schizotypal facets of Odd Beliefs or Magical Thinking and Ideas of Reference, conspiracist beliefs, and cognitive processes related to need for cognition, analytic thinking, and cognitive insight. Path analysis confirmed the associations between both schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs in the present sample. Confirmatory evidence was found for the association between analytic thinking and conspiracist beliefs, and results also suggested an association between cognitive insight and conspiracist beliefs. Cognitive insight also mediated the link between Odd Beliefs or Magical Thinking and Ideas of Reference with conspiracist beliefs. However, analytic thinking provided a mediating link to conspiracy ideation for Odd Beliefs or Magical Thinking and not Ideas of Reference. Finally, there was an association between Odd Beliefs or Magical Thinking and need for cognition, but this path did not extend to conspiracist beliefs. These results suggest possible mediating roles for analytic thinking and self-certainty between schizotypy and conspiracist beliefs.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

259

Page range

15-20

Publication title

Psychiatry Research

ISSN

1872-7123

Publisher

Elsevier

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2017-10-12

Legacy creation date

2017-10-02

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC