Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Shultz_2016.pdf (678.12 kB)

An Investigation of Structure, Flexibility and Function Variables that Discriminate Asymptomatic Foot Types

Download (678.12 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 14:36 authored by Sarah P. Shultz, Jinsup Song, Andrew P. Kraszewski, Jocelyn F. Hafer, Smita Rao, Sherry Backus, Rajshree Mootanah, Howard J. Hillstrom
It has been suggested that foot type considers not only foot structure (high, normal, low arch), but also function (overpronation, normal, oversupination) and flexibility (reduced, normal, excessive). Therefore, this study used canonical regression analyses to assess which variables of foot structure, function, and flexibility can accurately discriminate between clinical foot type classifications. The feet of 61 asymptomatic, healthy adults (18–77 years) were classified as cavus (N = 24), rectus (N = 54), or planus (N = 44) using standard clinical measures. Custom jigs assessed foot structure and flexibility. Foot function was assessed using an emed-x plantar pressure measuring device. Canonical regression analyses were applied separately to extract essential structure, flexibility, and function variables. A third canonical regression analysis was performed on the extracted variables to identify a combined model. The initial combined model included 30 extracted variables; however 5 terminal variables (malleolar valgus index, arch height index while sitting, first metatarsophalangeal joint laxity while standing, pressure-time integral and maximum contact area of medial arch) were able to correctly predict 80.7% of foot types. These remaining variables focused on specific foot characteristics (hindfoot alignment, arch height, midfoot mechanics, Windlass mechanism) that could be essential to discriminating foot type.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

33

Issue number

3

Page range

203-210

Publication title

Journal of Applied Biomechanics

ISSN

1543-2688

Publisher

Human Kinetics

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2017-01-25

Legacy creation date

2017-03-30

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)

Note

Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from 'Journal of Applied Biomechanics' 2016, http://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0001. © Human Kinetics, Inc.

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC