File(s) not publicly available
The effect of dry needling for myofascial trigger points in the neck and shoulders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 13:48 authored by Joshua Ong, Leica S. ClaydonBackground and purpose:
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to determine the effect of dry needling in the treatment of MTrPs.
Methods:
Searches were performed using the electronic databases AMED, EBM reviews, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE (all from database inception-February 2012).
Study selection:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared dry needling with another form of treatment or placebo and included pain intensity as an outcome.
Data extraction:
Two blinded reviewers independently screened the articles, scored their methodological quality and extracted data.
Quality assessment:
Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality scale and the Cochrane risk of bias tool were used.
Results:
Four RCTs compared dry needling to lidocaine and one RCT compared dry needling to placebo. Meta-analyses of dry needling revealed no significant difference between dry needling and lidocaine immediately after treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.41 (95%CI −0.15 to 0.97), at one month (SMD −1.46; 95% CI −2.04 to 4.96) and three to six months (SMD −0.28; 95% CI −0.63 to 0.07).
Discussion:
Although not significant in the meta-analyses, there were interesting patterns favoring lidocaine immediately after treatment and dry needling at three to six months.
History
Refereed
- Yes
Volume
18Issue number
3Page range
390-398Publication title
Journal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesISSN
1532-9283External DOI
Publisher
ElsevierLanguage
- other
Official URL
Legacy posted date
2016-07-08Legacy Faculty/School/Department
ARCHIVED Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education (until September 2018)Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC