Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Hughes et al 2012.pdf (67.59 kB)

When is open-endedness desirable in restoration projects?

Download (67.59 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 13:39 authored by Francine M. R. Hughes, William M. Adams, Peter A. Stroh
A low-intervention approach to restoration that also allows restoration outcomes to be framed as trajectories of ecosystem change can be described as ‘open-ended’ restoration. It is an approach that recognizes that long-term ecosystem behavior involves continual change at small and large spatial and temporal scales. There are a number of situations in which it is appropriate to adopt an open-ended approach to restoration including: in remote and large areas; where ecological limiting factors will be changed by future climates; where antecedent conditions cannot be replicated; where there are novel starting points for restoration; where restoration relies strongly on processes outside the restoration area; in inherently dynamic systems; where costs are high and where the public demands ‘wildness’. Where this approach is adopted managers need to explain the project and deal with public expectations and public risk. Monitoring biotic and abiotic components of the project are very important as an open-ended approach does not equate to ‘abandon and ignore it’.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

20

Issue number

3

Page range

291-295

Publication title

Restoration Ecology

ISSN

1526-100X

Publisher

Wiley

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2013-01-03

Legacy creation date

2019-12-06

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC