Creating an interdisciplinary energy lexicon: Working with terminology differences in support of better energy policy

Robison, Rosalyn A. V. and Foulds, Chris (2017) Creating an interdisciplinary energy lexicon: Working with terminology differences in support of better energy policy. In: eceee 2017 Summer Study Consumption, Efficiency & Limits, 29 May –3 June 2017 Belambra Les Criques, Toulon/Hyères, France.

[img]
Preview
Text
Accepted Version
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (197kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Acceptance)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (28kB)
Official URL: http://proceedings.eceee.org/visabstrakt.php?event...

Abstract

Language shapes the practices and processes of energy research and policy. It is thus challenging that each disciplinary community has its own taken-for-granted terminology, which can be difficult for ‘outsiders’ to understand. Much of the interdisciplinary literature has focused on the challenges experienced in relation to this, with very little done on solutions. Moreover, most attempts to provide an overview of such (energy-related) definitions have still been undertaken within disciplinary silos and have tended to be narrow in scope (e.g. glossaries for one particular research/policy community), and have thereby failed to provide an adequate platform for cross-cutting policy debate and interdisciplinary exchange. This paper therefore aims to investigate how an interdisciplinary lexicon might be practically produced for energy researchers across the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), as part of providing a basis for interdisciplinary collaboration and a transparent platform for subsequent policy discussions. Specifically, the core of this paper (1) identifies a set of guiding principles that may assist in the creation of a lexicon and (2) proposes a method for creating an energy-SSH lexicon. All this is discussed in the context of a new EU Platform (SHAPE-ENERGY: Social sciences & Humanities for Advancing Policy in European ENERGY), which is following this proposed method in creating its own interdisciplinary energy lexicon. We will conclude by reflecting on how a lexicon such as the one that we propose – e.g. one that is reflexive, participatory, solutions-focussed, noted as being the start (not the end) of dialogue, and accounts for difference, etc. – could be used more broadly in other interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder contexts.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Keywords: accessibility, collaboration, communication, dialogue, EU policy, EU project, methods, interdisciplinary approaches, language, social sciences
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Technology
Depositing User: Ian Walker
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2017 13:45
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2017 14:30
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/701953

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item