UK construction safety: a zero paradox?

Sherratt, Fred and Dainty, Andrew (2017) UK construction safety: a zero paradox? Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. ISSN 1477-3996

[img] Text
Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 March 2018.
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (102kB)
[img] Other (Acceptance)
Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (82kB)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2017.1305040

Abstract

The zero accident mantra has become embedded within the safety discourse of large UK construction organisations, but the extent to which zero-focused approaches yield reductions in accident frequency is yet to be empirically investigated. By way of an evidence-based critique, we examine the relationship between major accidents and zero approaches by drawing on Health and Safety Executive accident data over a 4 year period, together with an analysis of major contractors’ safety approaches. This reveals that working on a project subject to a zero safety policy or programme actually appears to slightly increase the likelihood of having a serious life-changing accident or fatality; a possible ‘zero paradox’. Although these findings should be treated with caution, they suggest that the apparent trend towards abandoning zero amongst some large organisations is well-founded. As such, if zero policies stymie learning whilst failing to reduce accidents, the need for a countervailing discourse is clear.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: construction industry, safety, zero paradox, zero
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Technology
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email fred.sherratt@anglia.ac.uk
Date Deposited: 22 May 2017 11:13
Last Modified: 22 May 2017 11:13
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/701757

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item