Investigation of interocular blur suppression using luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise stimuli

Chima, Akash S. and Formankiewicz, Monika A. and Waugh, Sarah J. (2015) Investigation of interocular blur suppression using luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise stimuli. Journal of Vision, 15 (3). ISSN 1534-7362

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.3.22

Abstract

Presenting two sufficiently dissimilar images, one to each eye, may result in interocular suppression. The present study measured interocular suppression depth and extent in binocularly normal participants when blurring one eye only with varying dioptric lens powers (+0.5, +1, +2, and +4 D). Visual stimuli consisted of eight concentric rings of alternate polarity, divisible into eight sectors, within the central circular 24° visual field. Binocular “ring” stimuli therefore consisted of 64 individually testable dichoptic sectors. Using a two-alternative forced choice paradigm with a staircase procedure, signal strength of each dichoptic sector in the blurred eye was adjusted to perceptually match that of the surrounding ring from the nonblurred eye, determining the point of subjective equality. Rings were defined by differences in luminance (L), luminance-modulated noise (LM), or contrast-modulated noise (CM). Suppression depth was similar irrespective of sector location within the visual field and increased with increasing difference in interocular blur. Adding dynamic noise (LM vs. L stimuli) reduced the effect of blur on measured suppression depth. Significantly deeper suppression was measured for CM than for LM stimuli, both created using dynamic noise, the difference increasing at higher levels of interocular blur. As binocularity is disrupted with interocular blur, this result suggests that CM envelope combination may be processed by later mechanisms receiving binocular input than those required for the processing of LM stimuli. Differences in suppression depth between LM and CM stimuli could not be attributed to differences in spatial summation properties, stimulus visibility, noise modulation, or differential effects on blur discriminability.

Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: binocular vision, blur, contrast-modulated noise, interocular suppression, luminance-modulated noise, suppression mapping
Faculty: Faculty of Science & Technology
Depositing User: Mr I Walker
Date Deposited: 03 Nov 2015 10:44
Last Modified: 22 Aug 2016 13:39
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/581571

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item