Qualitative theory testing as mixed-method research

Piper, Stewart (2006) Qualitative theory testing as mixed-method research. Journal of Research in Nursing. ISSN 1361-4096

[img]
Preview
Text
Available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (65kB) | Preview

Abstract

While the concept of mixed-methods research is more usually associated with combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, this paper outlines a study that mixed methods by undertaking qualitative theory testing and derivation when examining the relationship between health promotion theory and hospital nursing practice. Thus, it is concerned with relating the metatheoretical aspects of the debate and not with the pragmatic aspects of the research and concomitant methods. A deductive–inductive–deductive design, based on the theory– research–theory strategy of Meleis (1985), tested, revised and developed for nursing established health promotion theory using theory-testing criteria. To complement the methodological mix, the study also used the theory (i.e. a health-promotion taxonomy) as a framework to contextualise the findings rather than generate theory in the way associated with interpretative inquiry. While inconsistent with the traditional view linking theory testing with quantitative, objective epistemology, the process enabled a theoretically robust healthpromotion taxonomy to be synthesised and advanced for use in nursing in relation to a paradigm of social thought.

Item Type: Journal Article
Additional Information: Citation: Piper, S., 2006. Qualitative theory testing as mixed-method research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), pp.183-193..
Faculty: Faculty of Health and Social Care (for research published prior to September 2011)
Depositing User: Mr I Walker
Date Deposited: 24 May 2011 15:18
Last Modified: 07 Jul 2016 12:49
URI: http://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/131904

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item